A sharp rotation away from Big Tech is underway as earnings reports from Oracle and Broadcom expose the high costs of the AI boom, triggering warnings from central banks and industry leaders.
Global financial markets are currently navigating their most significant volatility in years, driven by a sharp and sudden rotation away from the technology giants that have dominated stock indices for the past two years. In mid-December 2025, major indices plummeted as investors began offloading shares of artificial intelligence leaders, spooked by disappointing earnings reports and growing consensus that the "AI bubble" may finally be nearing its breaking point. The selloff, triggered by warnings regarding shrinking profit margins from key infrastructure players, marks a decisive shift in sentiment from unbridled optimism to caution.
The catalyst for this market correction appeared to be a one-two punch of data from the semiconductor and cloud sectors. According to reports, disappointing earnings from Broadcom and Oracle reignited fears that the capital expenditure required to sustain generative AI development is outpacing revenue growth. As of mid-December, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had closed down significantly, with momentum shifting rapidly toward cyclical sectors and value stocks.
Table of contents [Show]
The current downturn follows a period of historic valuations. Just months prior, in October 2024, OpenAI saw its valuation triple to an eye-watering $500 billion. However, by late 2025, the narrative began to fracture. The timeline of the current correction reveals a systemic repricing of risk:
In November 2025, initial cracks formed as fears of an "everything bubble" began to circulate. Reports from Yahoo! Finance highlighted that investors were rotating out of aggressive AI winners following a powerful multi-year run. By early December, the situation intensified. The New York Times reported that while some on Wall Street tried to shake off fears, the valuations of AI companies were uncomfortably approaching levels seen during the dot-com boom. The tipping point arrived mid-month when Broadcom and Oracle released outlooks that dampened sentiment, causing a ripple effect that dragged down Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia.
The core issue driving this selloff is not a disbelief in the technology itself, but rather the timeline of its return on investment (ROI). Companies have poured hundreds of billions into AI infrastructure, yet profit margins are beginning to compress under the weight of these expenditures.
"The drop was triggered by warnings from tech companies like Broadcom about shrinking profit margins from AI investments," noted recent market analysis. "This sparked a selloff in technology stocks and a rotation into other market sectors."
Yale management expert Jeffrey Sonnenfeld has warned that the complex web of AI deals among tech giants could indicate "dangerous overinvestment." This view is increasingly shared by institutional players. The Bank of England recently warned of the growing risks of a global market correction due to the overvaluation of leading AI firms.
Even industry insiders are sounding the alarm. In a candid admission, Google CEO Sundar Pichai told the BBC that the trillion-dollar AI investment boom contains "elements of irrationality," acknowledging that every company would be impacted if the bubble were to burst. This rare acknowledgment from the top tier of Silicon Valley has validated the concerns of bearish investors.
Herald van der Linde, head of equity strategy for Asia Pacific at HSBC, described the market movement as a necessary pause. "People are up to their noses in these AI stocks," he told Reuters. "My belief is that what we're going to see is a breather... and the breather could come with a rotation."
The implications of this correction extend far beyond stock portfolios. A sustained downturn in tech valuations could lead to a contraction in the aggressive hiring and expansion that has defined the sector for the last decade. Nicholas Sargen, an economic consultant, warned in The Hill that a stock market selloff of 20 to 30 percent is possible, which could "tip the U.S. economy into a moderate recession."
Politically, this creates a precarious situation for regulators and central banks. The Federal Reserve faces the challenge of managing a potential asset price deflation while trying to keep the broader economy stable. If the "wealth effect" from high stock prices evaporates, consumer spending could follow suit.
Looking ahead to 2026, forecasts are divergent. Capital Economics has drawn parallels to the Great Crash of 1929, predicting that the AI-fueled bubble will likely crash in 2026. However, other analysts argue for a "soft landing" scenario where capital rotates into overlooked sectors that can leverage AI for efficiency without carrying the exorbitant valuations of pure-play tech stocks.
What remains clear is that the era of indiscriminate buying of any stock associated with "AI" has ended. The market is entering a phase of scrutiny, where balance sheets and tangible profit margins will matter more than disruptive narratives.
An Indian tech CEO shares insights from 25 years of experience, arguing that AI is an amplifier, not a replacement. The article explores 10 real-world case studies where human empathy, creativity, and strategic thinking remain irreplaceable in business and society.
An Indian tech CEO argues that AI is an amplifier, not a replacement for humans. The article explores 10 real-world case studies, from medicine to leadership, where human empathy, creativity, and strategic thinking remain fundamentally superior to algorithms.
An in-depth look at why AI is a tool for human augmentation, not replacement. This article explores 10 case studies where human skills like empathy, strategic thinking, and ethical judgment remain superior, arguing for a future built on human-AI collaboration.
