As the trading year closes, mounting anxiety over unproven returns on massive AI investments has triggered volatility and skepticism among global fund managers.
As the final trading weeks of 2025 come to a close, global financial markets are gripped by a palpable sense of unease regarding the sustainability of the artificial intelligence boom. According to extensive reporting by Bloomberg throughout November and December, Wall Street is increasingly betting on "if" and "when" the AI bubble will pop. Despite unprecedented capital injection from tech giants like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta to build out AI infrastructure, investor confidence is wavering due to the lack of clear, profitable returns on these massive expenditures. The anxiety has introduced significant volatility into the market, marking a sharp pivot from the euphoria that characterized the earlier phases of the generative AI revolution.
The central tension lies in the disparity between spending and earning. While companies are racing to secure hardware and data center capacity-exemplified by OpenAI's recent move to team up with Foxconn for U.S. hardware manufacturing-investors are growing skeptical. Reports indicate that the massive "debt binge" Big Tech has undertaken to fund this race is raising alarm bells about leverage and financial stability.
Table of contents [Show]
The shift in sentiment has been building throughout the latter half of the year. In September 2025, JPMorgan Asset Management issued a stark warning, stating that disappointing earnings from artificial intelligence companies posed a "bigger risk" to the global stock rally than ongoing geopolitical tensions. This foreshadowed the turbulence seen in the fourth quarter.
By November 18, a Bank of America survey revealed that fund managers were raising concerns at levels unseen since 2005. The survey, which included 202 panelists managing $550 billion in assets, indicated a consensus that companies were overinvested and that the market had become "frothy." This sentiment was compounded on November 21, when Bloomberg reported a volatile week driven by "AI and crypto anxiety," highlighting the fragility of the current tech-driven rally.
The volatility continued into December. On December 12, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq closed down more than 1%, with reports citing earnings from Broadcom and Oracle as catalysts for reigniting bubble fears. As of mid-December, Bloomberg noted that during the "last full trading week of 2025," anxiety was bubbling over, with markets struggling to find a stable footing amidst the skepticism.
Background context is essential to understand the current predicament. Three years after the release of ChatGPT kicked off the generative AI craze, the focus has shifted from software capabilities to the physical reality of the "industrial stack" required to run it: compute power, data centers, energy, and robotics. This build-out is capital-intensive and slow to yield profit.
"Investors have parted with unprecedented sums of money to help AI fulfill its lofty promise. But no one really knows how it will all pay off," reported Bloomberg in late November.
The infrastructure demands have led to aggressive corporate maneuvers, such as Intel eyeing acquisition targets like SambaNova Systems and ServiceNow closing in on a $7 billion deal for cybersecurity startup Armis. These interconnected transactions are fueling fears that the boom is being propped up by deal-making rather than organic revenue growth.
Prominent voices in the investment community are sounding the alarm regarding decision-making driven by fear rather than fundamentals. Speaking at a Bloomberg event in Miami on December 6, Orlando Bravo, founder of Thoma Bravo, stated that the hype around AI has triggered "enormous anxiety" among investors. He warned that this environment has created a "fear of missing out" (FOMO) across private markets, pushing firms into decisions they may later regret.
This "private market FOMO" suggests that the bubble isn't just limited to public stock valuations but is distorting venture capital and private equity strategies as well. The concern is that when the dust settles, many of these high-valuation startups may fail to deliver viable business models.
The potential bursting of an AI bubble holds significant implications beyond Wall Street portfolios. Economically, a sharp correction could tighten capital availability for legitimate technological innovation. The "debt binge" identified by analysts means that if revenue streams from AI tools don't materialize quickly, major tech firms could face credit downgrades or be forced to slash R&D budgets.
Politically, the push for U.S.-based hardware manufacturing, such as the OpenAI-Foxconn collaboration, highlights the strategic importance of AI infrastructure. However, if the market collapses, these capital-intensive projects could be stalled, impacting jobs and national industrial strategies aimed at competing with China.
Looking ahead, analysts are divided on the severity of the potential correction. While comparisons to the dot-com bust are frequent, reports note that the Nasdaq 100 Index is priced at 26 times projected profits-high, but not reaching the astronomical levels seen during the internet bubble. Furthermore, "dip buyers" have continued to creep into the market during sell-offs, suggesting some residual confidence in long-term value.
As 2026 approaches, the market will likely demand proof of scalability and profitability. The "euphoria" phase is undeniably over, replaced by a period of scrutiny where earnings reports from AI-centric companies will be the primary drivers of global market stability. The question remains whether AI can transition from a speculative "trillion-dollar promise" to a foundational economic utility before investor patience runs out.
An Indian tech CEO shares insights from 25 years of experience, arguing that AI is an amplifier, not a replacement. The article explores 10 real-world case studies where human empathy, creativity, and strategic thinking remain irreplaceable in business and society.
An Indian tech CEO argues that AI is an amplifier, not a replacement for humans. The article explores 10 real-world case studies, from medicine to leadership, where human empathy, creativity, and strategic thinking remain fundamentally superior to algorithms.
An in-depth look at why AI is a tool for human augmentation, not replacement. This article explores 10 case studies where human skills like empathy, strategic thinking, and ethical judgment remain superior, arguing for a future built on human-AI collaboration.
